The thought of marriage generally invokes images of white weddings, little houses with picket fences and driving kids to soccer practice in the family station wagon. But all of these things cost money. Have you ever wondered if marriage is perhaps a bad investment? Or, with tax breaks and the like, could it possibly be a wise investment? Let's look at the costs associated with marriage.
Since 1990, the average price of a wedding in the United States has nearly doubled. In 2008, the price tag for nuptials reached $28,000 [source: Christian Science Monitor]. This includes everything from the engagement ring to the wedding gown and the honeymoon. But what about all of your new stuff? You're going to need a bigger place to stow all of your wedding presents. A new house sounds good, but they don't come cheap. Even in the midst of a slumping real estate market, the average cost of a new house in the United States in February 2008 was $296,400 [source: U.S. Census].
You could actually lose potential revenue through marriage, especially when you kick off your life together with a big wedding. Financial author Jeffrey Strain uses the example of a 25-year-old who chooses to invest $35,000 on an IRA that earns 9 percent annual interest rather than spend that money on a wedding. Instead of incurring a loss of revenue (or worse, entering into debt for the wedding), the person would find $1.26 million waiting for him or her on the other side of age 65 [source: The Street].
And don't forget the kids. In 2006, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated that a household in America with a gross average household income of $59,300 could expect to spend $197,700 per child from birth to age 18. The cost leaps to $289,380 per child for households with average incomes of $112,200 [source: USDA].
With all of the costs involved, is it more financially sound to simply stay single? Read about the pros and cons to marriage from an investment standpoint on the next page.