How Sin Taxes Work


A new federal sin tax on tobacco started April 1, 2009, driving the per-pack tax from 39 cents to $1.01. The tax affected all tobacco products, including cigars and pipes, and the money earned will be used to expand health coverage for low-income kids.
A new federal sin tax on tobacco started April 1, 2009, driving the per-pack tax from 39 cents to $1.01. The tax affected all tobacco products, including cigars and pipes, and the money earned will be used to expand health coverage for low-income kids.
Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Sticking with the cigarette tax example, skeptics argue that while cig sin taxes might be able to reduce smoking to a point, there seems to be a limit. If you keep upping the ante, the reductions often start levelling off. The reason for this is that some people just won't, or can't, quit, and since these same people are often poor, they can't afford to continue to buy cigarettes — legally.

In the early 1990s, the Canadian government sharply increased the tax rate on cigarettes. The hike was too steep, and it spawned a giant black market in contraband cigarettes. While black market sales of cigarettes accounted for only 1 percent of sales in 1987, they high-jumped to 31 percent in 1993. That's a result nobody wants. Not only does it mean the tax isn't having its desired effect on public health, it also means lost revenues. In 1994 Canada abruptly cut its sin taxes on cigarettes, a measure that helped reduce contraband sales and bring legal sales (and revenues) back up [source: Kelly-Gagnon].

This question of revenues is a big one. If you decide to raise a tax on a "sinful" product, you have to have a plan for what to do with the money that comes in. Often, the revenue is allocated for spending on health care. In some ways, this seems like an elegant, win-win solution. But sometimes it backfires.

In February 2009, Arkansas nearly doubled its tax on cigarettes to $1.15. The state had lots of great health-related plans for the projected $86 million in revenue this measure would bring in. But to the astonishment of legislators, rather than having more money, they ended up with $10 million less than they'd collected the previous year. The reason? Increased black market sales plus the more expedient (and legal) solution of simply crossing state lines to buy cheaper cigarettes [source: Moser].

And this brings us to yet another objection to sin taxes. Remember how the U.S. government was largely dependent on sin taxes for revenue up until 1913? That's no longer the case, but some sin-tax skeptics estimate that taken together, both state and federal governments collect $96 billion annually from our bad behavior [source: Otero]. This, they argue, puts government in a moral bind. On the one hand, they impose the taxes to encourage people to sin less, while on the other, the government then comes to depend on the income from all that sinful spending. In other words, lawmakers have to hope that people will behave better, but not too much.

Author's Note: How Sin Taxes Work

In researching this article I came across "racinos" — about which I was completely ignorant. A racino, as probably everybody but me knows, is where a casino meets a racetrack. Such a simple but brilliant synthesis bundles a wide range of vices into a tidy package, making it easier than ever before to sin, and nearly effortless to collect the accompanying tax.

Related Articles

More Great Links


  • Austin, Henry. "Nanny State Index: 'Excessive' regulation and 'sin taxes' make UK the worst place in the EU to be a wine drinker or smoker." Independent. March 31, 2016. (Oct. 13, 2016)
  • Brumby, Jim. "The seven salvos of sin (taxes)." The World Bank. March 25, 2014. (Oct. 13, 2016)
  • Chaloupka, Frank J. et al. "Effects of Price on Alcohol Consumption and Alcohol-Related Problems." NIH, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (Oct. 12, 2016)
  • Cooper, Brad. "Brownback's plan to hike Kansas sin taxes gets little support in the Legislature." Kansas City Star. Feb. 18, 2015. (Oct. 13, 2016)
  • Crossen, Cynthia. "Why Sumptuary Laws, Despite a Rich History, Never Lasted Very Long." The Wall Street Journal. June 15, 2005. (Oct. 7, 2016)
  • Falbe, Jennifer et al. "Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption." American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 106, No. 10. Pages 1865-1871. October 2016. (Oct. 7, 2016)
  • Friar, Christine. "Jon Stewart Criticizes Bloomberg's New York Soda Ban." The Huffington Post. June 1, 2012. (Oct. 7, 2016)
  • Goldin, Rebecca. "Can a Half-Cent Tax on Drink Save Lives?" April 29, 2015. (Oct. 13, 2016)
  • Governing. "Sin Tax Revenues by State." (Oct. 13, 2016)

  • Gray, Jerry. "States Have Problem With 'Sin' Revenue: There's Less Sinning." The New York Times. March 2, 1993. (Oct. 12, 2016)
  • Grynbaum, Michael. "New York Plans to Ban Sale of Big Sizes of Sugary Drinks." The New York Times. May 30, 2012. (Oct. 7, 2016)
  • Grynbaum, Michael. "New York's Ban on Big Sodas Is Rejected by Final Court." The New York Times. June 26, 2014. (Oct. 7, 2016)
  • Internal Revenue Service (IRS). "Historical Highlights of the IRS." July 6, 2016. (Oct. 7, 2016)
  • Kelly-Gagnon, Michel. "Why Flaherty's Sin Tax on Cigarettes Won't Work." The Huffington Post. Feb. 14, 2014. (Oct. 11, 2016)
  • McLure, Charles E. and Wayne R. Thirsk. "The Inequity of Taxing Iniquity: A Plea for Reduced Sumptuary Taxes in Developing Countries." Economic Development and Cultural Change. Vol. 26, No. 3. Pages 487-503. April 1978. (Oct. 11, 2016)
  • Moser, Joseph E. "'We Told You So': Increased Tobacco Tax Rate Reduces Revenues in Arkansas." Americans for Tax Reform. Dec. 8, 2009. (Oct. 11, 2016)
  • Newkirk, Vann R. "The Wages of Sin Taxes." The Atlantic. March 19, 2016. (Oct. 7, 2016)
  • New York State. "Cigarette and tobacco products tax." Department of Taxation and Finance. (Oct. 11, 2016)
  • Otero, Jordan E. "Banking on sin: States profit as taxes rise on vice." The Washington Times. Oct. 26, 2011. (Oct. 11, 2016)
  • Peters, Mark and Jon Kamp. "As Sin Taxes Succeed and Pinch Revenue, States Double Down." The Wall Street Journal. April 14, 2016. (Oct. 12, 2016)
  • Rampell, Catherine. "For Cash-Strapped States, Sin Is Sure Lucrative." The New York Times. April 17, 2010. (Oct. 12, 2016)
  • Remler, Dahlia K. "Poor Smokers, Poor Quitters, and Cigarette Tax Regressivity." American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 94, No. 2. Pages 225-229. February 2004. (Oct. 11, 2016)
  • Sirico, Rev. Robert A. "Hate the Sin, Tax the Sinner?" American Enterprise Institute. May 20, 2009. (Oct. 13, 2016)
  • Stier, Jeff and Gregory Conley. "The Christie-and-Kasich Tax Show." National Review. June 16, 2014. (Oct. 13, 2016)